From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9fbc059a74d74032 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-30 20:18:12 PST From: dale Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Leap Seconds Organization: rmit References: <9elpii$30i$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3B0ED67B.E40A4E06@averstar.com> <9f0ciq$itb$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9f2ue6$hcm$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9f347i$jo1$1@nh.pace.co.uk> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC) Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 13:15:52 +1000 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: dale.cs.rmit.edu.au X-Trace: 31 May 2001 13:17:11 +1100, dale.cs.rmit.edu.au Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!enews.sgi.com!news.xtra.co.nz!news.mel.connect.com.au!newshub1.rdc1.nsw.optushome.com.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!vrn.edu.au!mercury.its.rmit.edu.au!dale Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7908 Date: 2001-05-31T13:15:52+10:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote: > By the way, it seems to me that Ada *forbids* counting leap seconds, in > that the upper bound of Day_Duration is 86_400.0, rather than 86_401.0. > True? I doubt that it says that a time can't occur twice. You could get around it simply by returning time = 86_400 for 2 seconds, no? Dale