From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,92471489ebbc99c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dale@cs.rmit.edu.au (Dale Stanbrough)
Subject: Re: Y2K Issues
Date: 1998/10/30
Message-ID: <dale-3010982039580001@dale.ppp.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 406621717
References: <dale-2910981230010001@dale.ppp.cs.rmit.edu.au>
 <F1LGL1.B6F.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com> <71aejn$ped$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cs.rmit.edu.au
X-Trace: emu.cs.rmit.edu.au 909740398 12331 131.170.27.23 (30 Oct 1998
 09:39:58 GMT)
Organization: RMIT
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Oct 1998 09:39:58 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-10-30T09:39:58+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar wrote:

" and in fact GNAT does NOT permit users to add
  children to this package, despite Dale's claim. Yes, of course you can
  always decide you are a GNAT implementor and change the compiler, using
  internal implementor options, but users may not add such children."


This is of course what I was referring to (allowing _anyone_ to be a 
compiler implementor). I remember you making this comment two or three
years ago.


Dale