From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,95eaa0c908f1c040
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dale@cs.rmit.edu.au (Dale Stanbrough)
Subject: Re: the Ada object oriented-approach is stupid
Date: 1998/11/26
Message-ID: <dale-2611980833440001@dale.ppp.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 415654653
References: <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>
 <73hok7$s41@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cs.rmit.edu.au
X-Trace: emu.cs.rmit.edu.au 912029623 10549 131.170.27.23 (25 Nov 1998
 21:33:43 GMT)
Organization: RMIT
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Nov 1998 21:33:43 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-11-25T21:33:43+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

partha sarathi panda wrote:

"can anyone convince me on why the Ada object-oriented model does even
 compare with  the tight c++ one?"


Could you please describe the important aspects of the C++ model in your
opinion? (although i doubt you will, so many postings of these sorts are
just "hit and run" from people who lack the intellectual integrity to 
actually seek the answers for the questions they ask).

Dale