From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e5eb8ca5dcea2827
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dale@cs.rmit.edu.au (Dale Stanbrough)
Subject: Re: Ada OO Mechanism
Date: 1999/05/21
Message-ID: <dale-2105991123310001@r1021c-00.ppp.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 480345014
References: <7i05aq$rgl$1@news.orbitworld.net>
 <dale-2105990836310001@r1021c-18.ppp.cs.rmit.edu.au>
 <7i277k$1h17@drn.newsguy.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cs.rmit.edu.au
X-Trace: emu.cs.rmit.edu.au 927249811 15070 131.170.66.200 (21 May 1999
 01:23:31 GMT)
Organization: RMIT
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 May 1999 01:23:31 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-05-21T01:23:31+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

bob wrote:

" Same semantics, (expressing love), but different synatx (sound wise). So, 
  what you think is only syntactic sugar, for others might be more. It might 
  have some deeper feelings associated with it, that brings up some images
  associated with personal emotions."


I'll keep that in mind next time I compile an Ada program with a woman
as the target.

Dale