From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5e7d910855b4fd03
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dale@cs.rmit.edu.au (Dale Stanbrough)
Subject: Re: access type referencing nested array element
Date: 1998/09/20
Message-ID: <dale-2009981033240001@dale.ppp.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 392865246
References: <WishList-1809982135380001@a17.phoenix-14.goodnet.com>
 <EzJ5Gp.JG5.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com> <6u0fmj$hlm$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809191254440.27151-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cs.rmit.edu.au
X-Trace: emu.cs.rmit.edu.au 906251511 11817 131.170.27.23 (20 Sep 1998
 00:31:51 GMT)
Organization: RMIT
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Sep 1998 00:31:51 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-09-20T00:31:51+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar wrote...
 
" In particular, the horrible phenomenon of people importing
  a C style into Ada 95 is something I often see, with the
  aliased keyword all over the place. Perfectly dreadful
  coding style!"


But of course a better style is to silenty do a 'Unrestricted_Access
deep inside your code (a'la Gnat.Spitbol :-)


Dale