From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d342f2360cfae987
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dale@cs.rmit.edu.au (Dale Stanbrough)
Subject: Re: what is happening here? (access types & discriminants...)
Date: 2000/03/20
Message-ID: <dale-2003000749300001@192.168.0.2>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 599659134
References: <dale-1903002134440001@192.168.0.2> <8b2hql$ekn$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Trace: 20 Mar 2000 07:45:37 GMT, r1021c-02.ppp.cs.rmit.edu.au
Organization: RMIT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar wrote:

> Not quite clear what you are asking, this is simply a
> constrained subtype, no different conceptually from
> 
>  x : integer range 1 .. 100;



Does the declartion cause the pointer to only be able to point
at arrays from 1..100? If so I didn't know you could constrain
pointers in such a way.


Dale