From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e9f0eae6d714d11c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dale@cs.rmit.edu.au (Dale Stanbrough) Subject: Re: Gnat pretty printing Date: 1998/12/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 423084965 References: <74lt16$9r0@romeo.logica.co.uk> <366E9E44.AA7370C7@pwfl.com> <74on70$m9o$1@cnn.Princeton.EDU> <36714049.2C5CE298@pwfl.com> <36768419.79B1F29A@pwfl.com> <756f3f$pjn$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <3676DF28.8C0C3C3A@pwfl.com> <758k9g$j6l$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@cs.rmit.edu.au X-Trace: emu.cs.rmit.edu.au 913857732 6288 144.205.16.58 (17 Dec 1998 01:22:12 GMT) Organization: Department of Computer Science, RMIT NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Dec 1998 01:22:12 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-12-17T01:22:12+00:00 List-Id: Mr dennison@telepath.com wrote: > > procedure Pop > > ( Item : out Element_Type > > ; List : in out List_Type > > ; Flag : in Boolean > > ) ; > > > > That is a style which had not occurred to me. I guess it has the > advantage that each parameter starts in the same column, but it really > disturbs my eye that the terminating semicolon isn't after the thing it > terminates. They are not terminating semicolons (the last one in the list -doesn't- have one) - they are separating semicolons. It is more consistent, but it still doesn't follow that it is easy to read. I suspect that our use of semicolons in natural languages makes it use at the start of a line always seem a bit suspect. Dale