From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,75f801a441e572e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dale@cs.rmit.edu.au (Dale Stanbrough) Subject: Re: Java/embedded Date: 1999/05/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 478661119 References: <373fdd8a.41515466@news2.ibm.net> X-Complaints-To: abuse@cs.rmit.edu.au X-Trace: emu.cs.rmit.edu.au 926906708 713 144.205.16.58 (17 May 1999 02:05:08 GMT) Organization: RMIT NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 1999 02:05:08 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-05-17T02:05:08+00:00 List-Id: Jean-Marten Marchi wrote: "Thinking to it, there's something i don't understand with Java embedded. You have a remote machine with a JVM running, fine. Since the applets you download on this remote machine are only running inside the JVM, what can they really do, except stealing CPU cycles ? At one time or another, you have to interact with the remote machine, thus breaking the portability of your applet. In this case, what is the JVM good for ?" you have a JVM with some classes relating to the particular machine embedded in ROM. Programs that you download to it talk to those classes. Dale