From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,365c587e3030d8f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dale@cs.rmit.edu.au (Dale Stanbrough) Subject: Re: Win32Ada Date: 1998/11/13 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 411381366 References: <72as14$bh4$1@platane.wanadoo.fr> <01be0e3b$a980c340$5da65c8b@aptiva> <72ev6o$gn$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <364BE12F.F38A285C@cts.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@cs.rmit.edu.au X-Trace: emu.cs.rmit.edu.au 910944086 13763 131.170.27.23 (13 Nov 1998 08:01:26 GMT) Organization: RMIT NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Nov 1998 08:01:26 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-11-13T08:01:26+00:00 List-Id: dpw@cts.com wrote: "In any case, the real problem with Win32Ada is that it is stuck at NT 3.5. This is why we also make available an alternate binding that actually evolves with the API (and has no funny Gatesian license restrictions.) Then again there are other options like the CLAW binding." Also we have totally open source products such as WINE, which provides for the Windows API for totally non Microsoft environments such as Linux. I wonder is someone could make an Ada binding to WINE, that would just happen to have the lucky coincidence of working with Windows :-) Dale