From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f849b,857262ad7d0ad537
X-Google-Attributes: gidf849b,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2f4cdd9ccfb8ede
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dale@cs.rmit.edu.au (Dale Stanbrough)
Subject: Re: How many different processors do you use?
Date: 1999/06/10
Message-ID: <dale-1006991037250001@dale.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 487715826
References: <7j1qng$4fp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37576ded.26569745@news.mpx.com.au>
 <7j8ac0$eah$1@uranium.btinternet.com> <7jh07e$tek$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jhp34$6f1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jjij7$qci$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jk7hk$36s$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jm5pa$ome$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jmmqi$vm2$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jmr4i$1c1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cs.rmit.edu.au
X-Trace: emu.cs.rmit.edu.au 928975045 21754 144.205.16.58 (10 Jun 1999
 00:37:25 GMT)
Organization: RMIT
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Jun 1999 00:37:25 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-06-10T00:37:25+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

muddy_buddy@my-deja.com wrote:

" Perhaps the offical process was, but there were C compliers out before
  the sign off.  Its that true of Ada 95?"


You have waded into this newsgroup with rather strange claims about
Ada and it's history. Now it seems you don't really know what the
situation was. Perhaps some prereading is in order.

The answer to your question is, yes, Gnat was available before the
standard was finalised, and it implemented parts/most of the new 
standard.


Dale