From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.99.110.67 with SMTP id j64mr3053595pgc.52.1498179624431;
        Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.157.40.162 with SMTP id s31mr140693ota.12.1498179624392;
 Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!f20no1025593itb.0!news-out.google.com!k7ni2314itk.0!nntp.google.com!185no1023748itv.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <oiggp3$2o4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=68.114.51.240;
 posting-account=HN9B-woAAACqJDcuOavWYdk7s1Vm8fv7
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.114.51.240
References: <1ac5a44b-4423-443a-a7bb-2864d9abe78f@googlegroups.com>
 <b3cdaa6d-6be7-48f4-9df8-f9557d0bf9b6@googlegroups.com>
 <1498048151.20885.28.camel@obry.net>
 <96174ea5-852d-44e9-8535-7c1eb24d5326@googlegroups.com>
 <oie5u1$ktk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <98b98b8b-2f56-4d14-9989-3df51b08d97e@googlegroups.com>
 <oifrkg$sr7$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <a4c9309f-6c4b-46a3-85eb-8cadd885683a@googlegroups.com>
 <oiggp3$2o4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <dafa428e-64b4-41ba-b77a-9a422fee6a42@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada Annoyances
From: pythoner6@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 01:00:24 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:47065
Date: 2017-06-22T18:00:24-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 9:30:15 AM UTC-4, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> Re-dispatch is dynamic dispatch when you go through the same virtual 
> table twice. Since you are already there = you have determined the 
> actual specific type, it does not make sense (and dangerous) to do this 
> again.

I see. I think it's actually really cool that Ada allows this flexibility in choosing when dynamic dispatch happens.