From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,595c75298fbdce96
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!o19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Ada novice <posts@gmx.us>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is Aunit helpful?
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <daea94be-eb3a-4984-a6de-0b68225e3139@o19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <8a1e58c0-2330-4475-8013-97df103dd85e@o19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
	<82r5ids1o9.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.11.22.91
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1281029345 4514 127.0.0.1 (5 Aug 2010 17:29:05
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 17:29:05 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: o19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=193.11.22.91;
	posting-account=Rr9I-QoAAACS-nOzpA-mGxtAlZ46Nb6I
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8)
	Gecko/20100722 Firefox/3.6.8 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12885
Date: 2010-08-05T10:29:05-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Aug 5, 2:07=A0pm, Stephen Leake <stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org>
wrote:

> Yes, it is a good way to organize your testing.

I tried to look at the examples supplied in the aunit manual and they
aren't so straightforward to me. Are there other sources (on the web?)
that show how to use this testing tool? Or maybe I should just print
out the manual and read it carefully.

>
> It will not save time initially, but it will definitely save time in the
> long run.

It's definitely better in the long run to have good organization in
the codes and do things systematically in a proper way using a testing
tool such as aunit.


Thanks
YC