From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,13b7917466f2d19 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-06 09:33:13 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!in.nntp.be!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: <9a575af3.0110020747.2304ce86@posting.google.com> <9pr6e8$aai1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <%biw7.8780$H81.3054034106@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com> <5ee5b646.0110092211.a69a5f@posting.google.com> <3C0E933F.86CA2FB8@usa.com> <5ee5b646.0112052127.421f6d4@posting.google.com> Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.0 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 12:32:57 EST Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 17:32:57 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17516 Date: 2001-12-06T17:32:57+00:00 List-Id: In article <5ee5b646.0112052127.421f6d4@posting.google.com>, Robert Dewar says... > >Ronald Cole wrote in message news:... >> If you don't think it's a threat, then how about volunteering to >> provide me with wavefront sources? I'm interested in comparing them >> against what's currently in the gcc cvs tree. > > >The only difference between the wavefront sources and >what is in the gcc cvs tree is that the latter is modified >to be compatible with GCC 3, while as our qualified >wavefronts are still GCC 2.8.1 based. Well that's not .. >days behind in keeping the trees synchronized. It can also >be the case that patches submitted to the gcc tree have not >been back syncrhonized into the act tree, but in general >the difference is not more than a few days. I originally had the same issue with the "wavefronts" that Ron had. However, now that the official repository is the public gcc cvs tree, my level of caring about ACT wavefronts has dropped to near zero. If someone wants an interim version of Gnat, then the public gcc cvs tree is the place to go for it. Internal ACT versions are just that: internal. I wouldn't want one now if it were offered to me. --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.