From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7bcba1db9ed24fa7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-08 13:30:26 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news.tele.dk!129.250.35.146!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!iad-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: RE: is ada dead? Message-ID: References: Organization: LJK Software Date: 8 Jul 2001 16:28:44 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.44.122.34 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net X-Trace: iad-read.news.verio.net 994624138 216.44.122.34 (Sun, 08 Jul 2001 20:28:58 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 20:28:58 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9643 Date: 2001-07-08T16:28:44-05:00 List-Id: In article , "Robert C. Leif, Ph.D." writes: > One very expensive judgment, which includes negligence, against a software > vendor will suffice to make vendors conscious that they are legally required > to use the appropriate tools to create their products. Typically using practices common in your industry is an adequate legal defense in the US.