From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f822ae7b0f7433c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Translating an embedded C algorithm Date: 16 Jan 2007 08:48:53 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <1168871816.263502.212100@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1168958899 20898 192.135.80.34 (16 Jan 2007 14:48:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8175 Date: 2007-01-16T08:48:53-06:00 List-Id: In article , Markus E Leypold writes: > >> And why cannot C be augmented by RTOSs and other systems software to >> achieve this? > > Can and has been. Of course there are tradeoffs like the safer type > system of Ada vs. the higher popularity (read more libraries and > existing code) of C and the fact that you can invent your own tasking > primitives in C. It seems to me you _can_ invent your own tasking primitives in Ada, but such is rarely necessary. Using the tasking system that comes with Ada is typically preferable.