From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ae8393ad9100e97,start
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.189.194 with SMTP id gk2mr7834019pbc.3.1324038409313;
        Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:26:49 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni29026pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!z1g2000vbx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Martin <martin@thedowies.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Ada2012 : When to use expression functions rather than function
 bodies?
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:25:09 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <d98a9754-62bb-4f95-bba4-45f498c703bd@z1g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.133.0.8
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1324038409 21728 127.0.0.1 (16 Dec 2011 12:26:49
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:26:49 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z1g2000vbx.googlegroups.com; posting-host=20.133.0.8;
 posting-account=g4n69woAAACHKbpceNrvOhHWViIbdQ9G
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUALERCFNK
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:9.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/9.0,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2011-12-16T04:25:09-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Are there any good arguments for *not* replacing all simple, single
line functions that don't [directly] access package body state
information with expression functions?

-- Martin