From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3946:: with SMTP id
 g67-v6mr19041503ioa.20.1539070715485;
        Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:7552:: with SMTP id q79-v6mr442666oic.1.1539070715217;
 Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.166.216.MISMATCH!x98-v6no25906ita.0!news-out.google.com!n199-v6ni63itn.0!nntp.google.com!x98-v6no25905ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 00:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87d0sj379h.fsf@nightsong.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=62.121.55.154;
 posting-account=9KbC2woAAAA0kK2IAUr3-FkzJBtOzrhm
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.121.55.154
References: <0f5608ef-0038-491c-b15f-f67bcc76fae8@googlegroups.com>
 <00285ebf-6ede-44da-848f-456930dc7475@googlegroups.com>
 <ppgnnu$v90$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <0028bb67-9b19-46a5-a126-3415e0281add@googlegroups.com>
 <87d0sj379h.fsf@nightsong.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d92a6cbb-316f-419a-9968-cdb8a0b12789@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Record operations (Algebraic Data Types and printing)
From: =?UTF-8?B?SGVucmlrIEjDpHJrw7ZuZW4=?= <heharkon@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 07:38:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:54522
Date: 2018-10-09T00:38:34-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tuesday, 9 October 2018 10:32:12 UTC+3, Paul Rubin  wrote:
> Henrik H=C3=A4rk=C3=B6nen <heharkon@gmail.com> writes:
> > And interestingly, what got me initially checking more about Ada, was
> > this Wikipedia page about Dependent Types, where "Ada 202x" was listed
> > to be supporting those:
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependent_type
>=20
> I don't think that can be right, in the sense in which that term is
> normally used.  But, I think C++ uses it to mean something different, so
> maybe Ada 202x does as well.

Maybe so, yes. Ada has other tools for provability etc. Maybe they go along=
 with those lines.