From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid113ae9,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!cyclone.bc.net!snoopy.risq.qc.ca!news.ccs.queensu.ca!dalamb From: dalamb@qucis.queensu.ca (David Alex Lamb) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.java.help Subject: Re: ADA vs Java Date: 16 Jun 2005 21:25:06 GMT Organization: Computing & Information Science, Queen's University Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: innovate.cs.queensu.ca Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11431 comp.lang.java.help:17685 Date: 2005-06-16T21:25:06+00:00 List-Id: In article , Ted wrote: >Writing code in ADA 95 and compiling it for the JVM should produce more >reliable code than writing in Java 2. Does anyone know any good technical >reasons for prefering Java? Last time I looked at Ada, its concurrency model was very different from the threads Java uses. Are you sure the JVM can handle all of Ada? -- "Yo' ideas need to be thinked befo' they are say'd" - Ian Lamb, age 3.5 http://www.cs.queensu.ca/~dalamb/ qucis->cs to reply (it's a long story...)