From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3e8a:: with SMTP id
 l132-v6mr11926305ioa.35.1524503073112;
        Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2044:: with SMTP id n62-v6mr899748ota.4.1524503072531;
 Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!f63-v6no3181514itc.0!news-out.google.com!b185-v6ni3063itb.0!nntp.google.com!f63-v6no3181512itc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d28c5bc2-6737-4a9a-8ab5-1e1a79866d8b@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=47.185.233.194;
 posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.185.233.194
References: <f2cc5db4-1abf-4a4c-92ed-089e0e7d6d21@googlegroups.com>
 <d28c5bc2-6737-4a9a-8ab5-1e1a79866d8b@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d898e6b7-556a-417d-880a-97cb3213380d@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Using the "Terminated" aspect for a task passed to a generic
From: "Dan'l Miller" <optikos@verizon.net>
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:04:33 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2508
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4025732331
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51682
Date: 2018-04-23T10:04:32-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 11:35:11 AM UTC-5, Dan'l Miller wrote:
> On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 9:20:33 AM UTC-5, NiGHTS wrote:
> > generic
> >=20
> >         type Managed_Task_Type is limited private;
>=20
> Wait.  Why can't we write:
>=20
> generic
>   type Managed_Task_Type is limited task interface;
> package WD is
> ...
>=20
> as per 12.5.5's AI95-00345 example in the _AARM:2012TC1_ page 527 (given =
there without the
> =E2=80=9Climited=E2=80=9D)?

Oh, as per _AARM:2012TC1_'s 3.9.4's Syntax paragraph 2/2, the syntax doesn'=
t support the limited there because of the subsequent 5/2's =E2=80=9C=E2=80=
=A6 all task and protected interfaces are synchronized interfaces, and all
synchronized interfaces are limited interfaces=E2=80=9D.  So amended, it wo=
uld revert to aforementioned example:

Wait.  Why can't OP modify the design to write:

generic
  type Managed_Task_Type is task interface;
package WD is
... // then the OP's design adjusted to pass in the task-interfaced type in=
stead of having the package
    // contain a freshly-declared task.

as per 12.5.5's AI95-00345 example in the _AARM:2012TC1_ page 527?