From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.107.44.17 with SMTP id s17mr6153966ios.77.1477074816535;
        Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.157.60.235 with SMTP id t40mr1237094otf.0.1477074816510;
 Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!e187no1542368itc.0!news-out.google.com!203ni1074itk.0!nntp.google.com!66no1554864itl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <36f46056-6126-4c0b-8955-9408e05d0708@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=87.91.37.131;
 posting-account=hya6vwoAAADTA0O27Aq3u6Su3lQKpSMz
NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.91.37.131
References: <7eaadf74-c55f-4c00-8f13-bf027cce130e@googlegroups.com>
 <nub1t5$iec$1@dont-email.me>
 <fdcc461d-0800-42e5-a130-a31a7edd5e3b@googlegroups.com>
 <36f46056-6126-4c0b-8955-9408e05d0708@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d862c223-fd53-4674-90e2-ab04cfda96f2@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: LLVM and Ada
From: vincent.diemunsch@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:33:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32157
Date: 2016-10-21T11:33:36-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le vendredi 21 octobre 2016 15:47:06 UTC+2, jpark...@gmail.com a =C3=A9crit=
=C2=A0:

> The author of the GNAT LLVM compiler posted a few remarks on the subject =
in 2014. A search of comp.lang.ada should pull up the thread easily enough.=
 I'll cut and paste the text for you.     J.
>=20

> no, there were no blocking technical problems.  For example I got nested =
function support working properly a gazillion years ago, as Luke says.  Exc=
eption handling took longer to be completely reliable, but that was also re=
solved years ago too.  In both cases changes needed to be made to LLVM, but=
 those changes are all old hat now. =20
All that happened is that I lost interest in the project and no-one stepped=
 forward to take it over. =20

That's really good news (for LLVM I mean :-) ) ! Thank you very much "J.".
Regards,
Vincent