From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,d59853e2dd116420 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-12 06:23:35 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: antoniovargas@oninet.pt (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ant=F3nio_Vargas?=) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: JGNAT status??? (Volunteers?) Date: 12 Aug 2002 06:23:35 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: <3d49f31b@oit.umass.edu> <3D4A3D23.6090905@ib-paus.com> <3D4A7C39.2AF0BA8@earthlink.net> <5fe90c1a.0208021138.54f5817f@posting.google.com> <3D4B982D.7010100@ib-paus.com> <5ee5b646.0208030636.2a4b1240@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.58.33.237 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1029158615 25247 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2002 13:23:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Aug 2002 13:23:35 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27951 Date: 2002-08-12T13:23:35+00:00 List-Id: Hi Its a shame that jgnat is dying. Are there skilled (not pseudo skilled) voluntears in Java VM and/or Gnat/JGnat internals for a sourceforge project based in jgnat1.1p. This is just a question not a compromise. Without critical mass nothing can be done. Ant�nio Vargas Barcelos - Portugal. ============================================= dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote in message news:<5ee5b646.0208030636.2a4b1240@posting.google.com>... > "Dr. Michael Paus" wrote in message news:<3D4B982D.7010100@ib-paus.com>... > > Yes, a new public version of the current JGNAT sources > > could be great. > > We have no plans for any further work on JGNAT > > > ?> if it is true that a version exists which runs on Java > > 1.3+. > . > It is false. There were indeed filed bugs in this area, but > they were never solved. > > > Maybe we can convince ACT to consider > > this. > > What is "this"? Doing more work on JGNAT? That's not going > to happen. The sources are out there, the first task would > be to update them to be compatible with the GNAT 5 sources > at gnu.org. That might be an interesting project, but it is > not something that Ada Core will be able to help with. > > Robert Dewar > Ada Core Technologies