From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4f22:0:b0:647:2b82:5fd9 with SMTP id fc2-20020ad44f22000000b006472b825fd9mr129809qvb.10.1694277987785; Sat, 09 Sep 2023 09:46:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ecc8:b0:1c2:c60:8384 with SMTP id a8-20020a170902ecc800b001c20c608384mr2122480plh.7.1694277987242; Sat, 09 Sep 2023 09:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2023 09:46:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.209.88.37; posting-account=bPTmZAoAAAC_6HP9XLKB9aAAxBa6BuOR NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.209.88.37 References: <38ab0ff7-afe0-4dfc-a073-427b46283451n@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is gnoga dead? From: reinert Injection-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2023 16:46:27 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Received-Bytes: 2530 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:65629 List-Id: l=C3=B8rdag 9. september 2023 kl. 13:59:04 UTC+2 skrev Jeffrey R.Carter: > On 2023-09-09 11:02, reinert wrote:=20 > > I asked google bard:=20 > >=20 > > "Is gnoga currently maintained?"=20 > >=20 > > And it answered:=20 > >=20 > > "No, Gnoga (Ada) is also no longer maintained. It was a fork of the ori= ginal=20 > Gnoga project that was created in 2012. The last commit to the GitHub rep= ository=20 > was in 2016.=20 > >=20 > > Gnoga (Ada) was an attempt to improve the performance and scalability o= f=20 > Gnoga. It used a different statistical approach to NLG and was implemente= d in Ada.=20 > >=20 > > There are a number of other NLG engines available, such as GPT-3 and La= MDA,=20 > which are more powerful and up-to-date than Gnoga (Ada)."=20 > >=20 > > Is this correct? > The presence of the word "also" in the first sentence should be enough to= tell=20 > you that this is nonsense.=20 >=20 > If you are asking about an "NLG engine" named gnoga, then maybe this is c= orrect.=20 > If you are asking about the Ada web-application framework Gnoga that Blad= y=20 > maintains, then it's not correct.=20 >=20 > --=20 > Jeff Carter=20 > =E2=80=9CAnyone who cannot cope with mathematics=20 > is not fully human.=E2=80=9D=20 > The Notebooks of Lazarus Long=20 > 214 Good to hear. Yes, did mean the Ada web-application framework. reinert