From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,af0c6ea85f3ed92d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.204.154.143 with SMTP id o15mr1046142bkw.4.1329036415034;
        Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:46:55 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 t13ni17877bkb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!f14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?bj=F6rn_lundin?= <b.f.lundin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Arbitrary Sandbox
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:40:07 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <d79f022c-bc18-42aa-8833-6f8e77612e3e@f14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
References: <bfeb9869-9323-4ad5-bdf8-af20593734ef@q8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
 <2aaee0a4-e820-4a75-bbaf-d9d09c366d2c@f5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <4da4bf75-e6c9-4c17-9072-ab6f533ed93f@vd8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
 <jh7739$9os$1@munin.nbi.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 46.195.147.141
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1329036414 24630 127.0.0.1 (12 Feb 2012 08:46:54
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:46:54 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=46.195.147.141;
 posting-account=3_reEwoAAAC163IAIrx427KYmwahFuh9
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUARLECNK
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X)
 AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML,
 like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-02-12T00:40:07-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 12 Feb, 03:10, "Randy Brukardt" <ra...@rrsoftware.com> wrote:
> "Rob Shea" <zzyca...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:4da4bf75-e6c9-4c17-9072-ab6f533ed93f@vd8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
> ...
>
> >If anyone is able to address my concerns about Ada on embedded systems
> >is awesome, but Ada on the abstraction of Windows, relying on the
> >APIs, etc... is this still awesome?

I work on a system were the servercode is in ada
And the clients are c#.
We do have More problems with the clients.
This is a warehouse control system. We also have
A warehouse management system with ada in server
And something completely different as clients.
But the ada part handles orders, inventory,
Talks to erp systems like sap, jde, axapta
Very well. Most of our customers are impressed
How often we get most thing right the first
Time.

Ada is not just for embedded.
It has its place where you want to model
The real world in software correctly - fast
--
Bj=F6rn