From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,54227ec6250b0edb,start X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.228.227 with SMTP id sl3mr6070034pbc.5.1341080737363; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 11:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni3166pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Ingo Marks Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Ada 2012 BNF syntax summary incomplete? Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 11:25:36 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.13.90.69 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1341080737 1053 127.0.0.1 (30 Jun 2012 18:25:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=178.13.90.69; posting-account=XYi0owoAAAC_eOHXu2MQKhBYUNiEUxE2 User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-06-30T11:25:36-07:00 List-Id: It seems to me that there are there missing items in the Ada 2012 BNF Syntax http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/12rm/html/RM-P.html For instance, the following items are used but not declared: - ancestor_subtype_indication - aspect_identifier - ... - selecting_expression - static_simple_expression There are about 50 items missing. Are they identical with the Ada95 specs? For instance, http://cuiwww.unige.ch/isi/bnf/Ada95/static_simple_expression.html If not, where can I find the complete BNF syntax? Thanks for advice. Ingo