From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.224.29.76 with SMTP id p12mr35703272qac.5.1373461585413;
        Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.108.47 with SMTP id hh15mr1647878igb.12.1373461585314;
 Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.bbs-scene.org!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!t19no1054170qam.0!news-out.google.com!f7ni1805qai.0!nntp.google.com!t19no1054165qam.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <10e0ayb59c6bm.tm4e9i7r32k4.dlg@40tude.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=20.133.0.8;
 posting-account=g4n69woAAACHKbpceNrvOhHWViIbdQ9G
NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.133.0.8
References: <69246de0-4b33-4d47-b5be-a45e8c911fb0@googlegroups.com>
 <wccwqpnux8n.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <eabcaba2-a5aa-499d-a179-917f5dde79f3@googlegroups.com>
 <wccbo6btnnd.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <5d428404-c530-4e54-9b00-f75db90a93a2@googlegroups.com>
 <10e0ayb59c6bm.tm4e9i7r32k4.dlg@40tude.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d6c889b0-54e3-43e4-8e3f-015887cba776@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada202X: Easy to use "UML private"-like components
From: Martin <martin@thedowies.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:06:25 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16264
Date: 2013-07-10T06:06:25-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:24:11 AM UTC+1, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> We are asking applicants to write a program that tests if a given bit in a byte
> is set. More than *half* of them fail. Quarter of the rest write a loop...

And writing a loop to do it _isn't_ a fail?!?! :-O

-- Martin