From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.140.205.214 with SMTP id a205mr17457690qhb.24.1463322183033; Sun, 15 May 2016 07:23:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.61.8 with SMTP id a8mr280450otc.7.1463322182836; Sun, 15 May 2016 07:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!88no4430412qga.1!news-out.google.com!l67ni857ith.0!nntp.google.com!i5no8673326ige.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 07:23:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.55.218.145; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.55.218.145 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ANN: Introducing AdaBase - Thick database bindings for Ada From: AdaMagica Injection-Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 14:23:02 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30413 Date: 2016-05-15T07:23:02-07:00 List-Id: Am Samstag, 14. Mai 2016 15:27:52 UTC+2 schrieb Georg Bauhaus: > On 14.05.16 14:22, AdaMagica wrote: > > I'm missing some introductory pages about "Where to begin and how to us= e this database interface". >=20 > I've felt at home immediately. It's a binding! It is using > standards based technology, vocabulary and syntax. Even ISO > standards based. >=20 > However, maybe I felt at home because relational databases > form a larger part of my day job. > Storage and retrieval of relational data using SPARK like > predicates =E2=80=94 one could call them that, tables and joins and > projections and restrictions and so forth being logic made > operational. >=20 > So, I'd consider that readers of the site might even take offense > at being directed towards an introduction to relational databases > and related theory. I do not see how presence of some documentation should or could offend some= one already knowing about how to do it. As I said, I have no idea of RDB. I= would have to learn, as it seems, two interfaces, the binding and the inte= rface it binds to. As I understand your description, they differ. If I wasn't clear enough about appreciating your fine work, I appologize. I= thought my last sentence made this clear.