From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.68.195.166 with SMTP id if6mr4525082pbc.6.1433197244983;
        Mon, 01 Jun 2015 15:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.182.44.163 with SMTP id f3mr146321obm.7.1433197244916; Mon,
 01 Jun 2015 15:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!h15no1795520igd.0!news-out.google.com!kd3ni34266igb.0!nntp.google.com!h15no1795517igd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mkam4d$7q5$1@loke.gir.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.0.105.201;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.0.105.201
References: <mjlale$dpk$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <127b004d-2163-477b-9209-49d30d2da5e1@googlegroups.com>
 <mjn90s$9av$1@dont-email.me>
 <f89a678a-f4a3-4a1c-91d7-d465177bbb1d@googlegroups.com>
 <mjnieh$ejn$1@dont-email.me>
 <ad8483c7-8f3c-4469-9079-a97ca3abaf27@googlegroups.com>
 <mjnpkt$b6j$1@dont-email.me>
 <59a4ee45-23fb-4b0e-905c-cc16ce46b5f6@googlegroups.com>
 <mjo0mk$7qu$1@dont-email.me>
 <46b2dce1-2a1c-455d-b041-3a9d217e2c3f@googlegroups.com>
 <mjpsdi$6cq$1@dont-email.me>
 <ac78c8c6-de94-4f92-afcb-c1ae78523245@googlegroups.com>
 <mk85s3$uee$1@loke.gir.dk> <87a8wnu3v0.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
 <288e200f-8379-45b3-8eb7-342564c920ef@googlegroups.com>
 <mkam4d$7q5$1@loke.gir.dk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d5f38685-8fb1-48e5-a4a9-36686f43e109@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Build language with weak typing, then add scaffolding later to
 strengthen it?
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:20:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26127
Date: 2015-06-01T15:20:44-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 3:36:15 PM UTC-6, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> "Shark8" wrote in message 
> news:288e200f-8379-45b3-8eb7-342564c920ef...
> On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 3:31:33 AM UTC-6, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> ...
> > Also, a way to refer to indices when in an array-aggrigare would be nice;
> > Ex: I:Array(1..4,1..4) of Integer := (others => (if I'Index(1) = 
> > I'Index(2) then 1 else 0));
> 
> See AI12-0061-1. It was considered too big a change to put into the 
> Corrigendum, else you'd already have it. The original proposal was part of 
> Ada 9x, but it was one of many "nice-to-haves" that got dropped in the 
> "scope reduction". And we didn't think of it again until it came here in 
> 2013 (causing Adam to formally propose it on Ada-Comment).
> 
>                                                 Randy.

Nice!
I did not know about that one.