From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,25d835bb9a4a003f
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Types, packages & objects : the good old naming conventions
	question (without religious ware)
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <d5812115-2776-4c0a-85d5-85b3733ccc15@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <ae7fb66b-4eff-405f-b568-77a1047ec6cb@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
	<48e4d22d-b83d-4f1d-8bcc-d1684345c9e8@a31g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
	<ubpjn69es.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.198.58.237
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1256994493 30438 127.0.0.1 (31 Oct 2009 13:08:13
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:08:13 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.198.58.237;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8925
Date: 2009-10-31T06:08:13-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 31 oct, 13:21, Stephen Leake <stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org>
wrote:
> > type Foo_Type is private;
> > type Foo_Access is access all Foo_Type;
>
> I use Foo_Access_Type for this.

What's your reason to use Foo_Access_Type instead of Foo_Access ?
Is that because of objects named Foo_Access ?

(just wanted to know)