From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.182.39.138 with SMTP id p10mr21056493obk.16.1453912299466;
        Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:31:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.182.241.195 with SMTP id wk3mr398236obc.8.1453912299444;
 Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:31:39 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!o2no6747553iga.0!news-out.google.com!l1ni9519igd.0!nntp.google.com!h5no10206786igh.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:31:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <KqYpy.274702$ey.247719@fx45.am4>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=193.251.73.50;
 posting-account=O3LyFwoAAACc1uh60ZcOUmAGdDmGsEcV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.251.73.50
References: <31402e8a-3d66-4b0b-b7ad-5bb34b17aa5e@googlegroups.com>
 <KqYpy.274702$ey.247719@fx45.am4>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d537ac48-52d6-4a39-842a-cf767f8b259d@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: IoT / IIoT stuff
From: slos <new.stephane.los@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:31:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29259
Date: 2016-01-27T08:31:38-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le mercredi 27 janvier 2016 06:18:42 UTC+1, Per Sandberg a =E9crit=A0:
> Well from my point of view the the important aspect is that we agree on=
=20
> a reasonable number of protocols on different levels in in the=20
> communication stacks and the protocols and standards (official or=20
> defecto) may be: IP, TCP, UDP, Spread, 0Mq, MQTT, AMQP,  Protobuff,=20
> Json, Corba, DDS,  or GumboJumbo.
>=20
> I actually don't care which one and on what level we are talking , but I=
=20
> do care that the community agree on communication standards that are=20
> language neutral an includes the full semantics of the data flows from=20
> application down to the lowest level of transport.
>=20
> The 0MQ bindings and the MQTT bindings was something I needed for some=20
> small projects (hobby and commercial).
>=20
> You are quite right concerning DDS there is an Ada binding to the RTI=20
> implementation of DDS where I also was "involved".
>=20
> I think that the next step would be to get a protobuffer implementation o=
ut.
>=20
> /Persan
>=20
> Den 2016-01-21 kl. 14:25, skrev slos:
> > Some implementations may provide an Ada binding.
> > I have found that most are open source and commercially supported.
> >
> > Do some of you have some thoughts and experiences to share on these sub=
jects ?

Hello Persan,

Thanks for providing the mosquitto-ada binding.

I've been trying it on my Debian Jessie and I've succeeded to have it worki=
ng although provided Mosquitto libs are 1.3.4-2 where you state 1.4 is need=
ed.
I've had some trouble with the relocate scenario but things are fine with t=
he static one.
I don't know yet if it has something to do with the old GPS provided or som=
e stupid error on my side.
Anyway, it looks like it may not be long before "Ada for Automation" floods=
 the cloud !

Best Regards,
St=E9phane LOS
http://slo-ist.fr/ada4autom