From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1fa85f3df5841ae1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!carbon.eu.sun.com!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mail
From: Martin Dowie <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.Containers.Vectors - querying multiple elements
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:17:07 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BT Openworld
Message-ID: <d4m0j3$3ej$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>
References: <mailman.76.1114515863.24457.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
	<426e4c2b$0$7515$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
	<mailman.78.1114526397.24457.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
	<1114530273.185327.319710@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
	<1114531544.32583.142.camel@localhost.localdomain>	<426E72C3.9070108@on2.com>
	<1114534751.32583.144.camel@localhost.localdomain>	<426E73DE.2070505@on2.com>
 <mailman.82.1114535329.24457.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host81-154-188-69.range81-154.btcentralplus.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com 1114539427 3539 81.154.188.69
 (26 Apr 2005 18:17:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:17:07 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.82.1114535329.24457.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10728
Date: 2005-04-26T18:17:07+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Duncan Sands wrote:
>>>But isn't it illegal to create a child of package Ada?
>>
>>But you're not creating a child of Ada.  You're creating a child of 
>>ada.containers.vectors.
> 
> 
> That is also illegal.  By "child" I was referring to any descendant.

No it is _not_ 'illegal' to add a {grand}child to the "Ada" package
hierarchy.

It is the namespace under "Ada" that the ARG seem particularly keen
on reserving.

Cheers

-- Martin