From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a909187f2cbcc49d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.241.162 with SMTP id wj2mr3894339pbc.2.1340607611305;
        Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni17318pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Austin Obyrne <austin.obyrne@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: 
 =?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_So_Who_is_Credited_with_Inventing_=93Count_Sort?=
	=?windows-1252?Q?=94_as_we_know_it_Today_=2D_Anybody=3F?=
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <d4eccdd1-1a64-4870-a1eb-0e786f55f3cd@googlegroups.com>
References: <c0e7f2af-ef13-41e4-8261-fb1d271be6a2@googlegroups.com>
 <4fe726b3$0$9518$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <b79ab9ff-bad3-4c17-9d34-d663b8e1a5f6@googlegroups.com>
 <qfofu7ppcifdrqeigsavumrr63vud6783q@invalid.netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.140.15.39
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1340607609 13952 127.0.0.1 (25 Jun 2012 07:00:09
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:00:09 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <qfofu7ppcifdrqeigsavumrr63vud6783q@invalid.netcom.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.140.15.39;
 posting-account=pmkN8QoAAAAtIhXRUfydb0SCISnwaeyg
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-06-25T00:00:09-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, June 25, 2012 5:06:19 AM UTC+1, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:08:50 -0700 (PDT), Austin Obyrne
> <austin.obyrne@hotmail.com> declaimed the following in comp.lang.ada:
> 
> 
> > It is not desperately important but I would like to be able to say that my implementation is the first in Ada and is completely independent of the algorithm in 1954 by H. Seaward (hope I've got the name right).
> >
> 	You need to take into account that "algorithm" basically means
> "recipe".
> 
> 	You are trying to emphasize that you baked (implementation) a loaf
> of bread using an electrically heated steel-wall oven using a recipe
> (algorithm) that was first baked (different implementation) using a
> wood-fired stone/clay walled oven. At best, you can claim that your
> "sour-dough starter" is different from the starter used by the bakery
> down the street -- but they both produce "sour-dough" loaves.
> 
> 	Implementing a known algorithm/recipe in a particular programming
> language doesn't earn any special credit. You would need to demonstrate
> that the language-independent algorithm itself is different to really
> gain credit.
> -- 
> 	Wulfraed                 Dennis Lee Bieber         AF6VN
>         wlfraed@ix.netcom.com    HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/

Yes - you are quite right.

Austin.