From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.84.233.2 with SMTP id j2mr4013090plk.14.1506029453650;
        Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.157.61.196 with SMTP id l62mr13424otc.17.1506029453496; Thu,
 21 Sep 2017 14:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!paganini.bofh.team!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!o200no291678itg.0!news-out.google.com!194ni831itf.0!nntp.google.com!o200no291669itg.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <oq0vi0$1i26$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2a01:c22:7a00:3000:955d:7e6b:a983:cc58;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a01:c22:7a00:3000:955d:7e6b:a983:cc58
References: <oq0vi0$1i26$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d489d42e-a8f1-466f-88f4-0d18765e27dc@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada.Strings.Unbounded vs Ada.Containers.Indefinite_Holders
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 21:30:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48198
Date: 2017-09-21T14:30:53-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am Donnerstag, 21. September 2017 20:14:29 UTC+2 schrieb Victor Porton:
> This may be a little slower.

Why do you care for performance? Have you ever measured what you are worrying about?

Premature optimization is the source of all evil - you can hear this mantra very often here.


> Hm well, do I understand Null_Unbounded_String correctly? Is 
> Null_Unbounded_String really "no string"? or is it just empty string ("")? 

It's the latter. Is RM A.4.5(73) and 2.5(6) clear enough?