From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ed9f245566db0d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-16 21:53:35 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: vashwath@rediffmail.com (prashna)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Question on arrays
Date: 16 Sep 2002 21:53:34 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <d40d7104.0209162053.716025c9@posting.google.com>
References: <slrnaobi46.5e7.randhol+news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <f5qh9.332184$_91.425787@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.90.88.229
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1032238415 27723 127.0.0.1 (17 Sep 2002 04:53:35
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Sep 2002 04:53:35 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29061
Date: 2002-09-17T04:53:35+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

tmoran@acm.org wrote in message news:<f5qh9.332184$_91.425787@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>...
> Does the segmentation fault still
> occur if you change the 2.0 to 2?  

Yes.

> Or if you get rid of the aggregate
>or change the array element to a slice?

I removed others and the statment looked like this A_Integer(2) := 2;
and did'nt get any error.

>A segmentation
>fault seems a little surprising as a compiler error message for such
a
>straightforward pair of errors.  

Yes, even I am wondering as to why it gave segmentation fault!!!!!!!?