From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.176.4.102 with SMTP id 93mr36150787uav.2.1481485852317; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 11:50:52 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.37.247 with SMTP id q110mr5888645ota.5.1481485852277; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 11:50:52 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!n6no5461851qtd.0!news-out.google.com!j8ni33988qtc.0!nntp.google.com!n6no5461849qtd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 11:50:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87twabx1ei.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.0.242.189; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.0.242.189 References: <47366b42-c0a3-41bf-a44a-5241c109d60f@googlegroups.com> <58f477d2-8b01-4001-bad8-47ea73424f4c@googlegroups.com> <6e206c3b-d4a8-44ab-9e0e-adb0924983ef@googlegroups.com> <10e8cb52-1cbd-40ed-ba11-f474c2263ced@googlegroups.com> <84oe4cdv010g9fba0jrjv2os7c0halucd0@4ax.com> <87twabx1ei.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ada 2012 Constraints (WRT an Ada IR) From: Shark8 Injection-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 19:50:52 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32727 Date: 2016-12-11T11:50:51-08:00 List-Id: On Saturday, December 10, 2016 at 8:13:42 AM UTC-7, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote: > G.B.writes: > > > (It also states "because of the classified nature of much Ada > > programming, these units had been wiped"... triggers a knee-jerk > > reaction) > > The R1000 at the Danish computing museum was used by a defense > contractor, so it makes sense that they wiped the machine. It would of > course have been nice, if they had kept an installation media for later > users of the machine, but how many of us think that far? > > Greetings, > > Jacob > -- > Who guards the guardians? There's also some interesting and informative posts regarding the R-1000 on the following blog: http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/category/geek/software-development/rat1000/ There's also this evaluation, which I've read (sometimes a bit dry, but interesting), here: http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1141&context=sei Here are the experimental transcripts, which I've not yet read: http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA204634