From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbc63810b4ca3da5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-23 11:55:24 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: volkert@nivoba.de (Volkert) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada Date: 23 Oct 2003 11:55:23 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.62.147.9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1066935324 23887 127.0.0.1 (23 Oct 2003 18:55:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1534 Date: 2003-10-23T11:55:23-07:00 List-Id: pautet@antigone.enst.fr (Laurent Pautet) wrote in message news:... > >OrbRiver/Ada supports : > >Interoperable Naming Service > >Corbaloc/Corbaname URLs > [...] > >MIOP (with a reliable implementation to come soon) > >Notification Service (entirely implemented in Ada95) > > Fine, Jean-Claude ! We have some of these with polyorb as well for > instance the two last ones. > > But my question was about the status of the Ada mapping. CORBA/Ada is > almost unusable for a user without the mapping. Has it been updated ? Strange ... Mr Pautet you are one persons behind polyorb ... polyorb leads to ACT. If i can get support from ACT for polyorb so why does ACT (as an orb vendor) not participate in the maintanance of corba standard? Volkert