From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbc63810b4ca3da5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-22 20:43:17 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: volkert@nivoba.de (Volkert) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada Date: 22 Oct 2003 20:43:16 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <0jXkb.6405$Vf7.4912@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.62.156.134 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1066880597 16256 127.0.0.1 (23 Oct 2003 03:43:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 03:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1484 Date: 2003-10-22T20:43:16-07:00 List-Id: "Xenos" wrote in message > > believe me, if there is no visible progress with > > the corba standard the things will getting harder > > for some of us ... it is really counterproductive > > > > Volkert > > we have a quite large ada system running here ... > > I'm using CORBA for Ada right now.... We are starting to evaluate one ada orb right now. Volkert