From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbc63810b4ca3da5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-22 11:20:46 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: volkert@nivoba.de (Volkert) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada Date: 22 Oct 2003 11:20:45 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <0jXkb.6405$Vf7.4912@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.62.156.134 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1066846846 22405 127.0.0.1 (22 Oct 2003 18:20:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1448 Date: 2003-10-22T11:20:45-07:00 List-Id: > My belief is that there is no real CORBA market for Ada so the > major tool vendors focus on other markets like the Java and C++ ones. i hope some ada (compiler, orb) vendors are clever enough to see the impact of middleware technologies for the future ada market. for the most companies using ada now it is really important to get/keep their systems accessible from other sw systems created with modern/mainstream technologies. otherwise it will be harder and harder to promote ada for any future developments and any future investments ... believe me, if there is no visible progress with the corba standard the things will getting harder for some of us ... it is really counterproductive Volkert we have a quite large ada system running here ...