From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3e8a:: with SMTP id
 l132-v6mr22190269ioa.35.1526458473706;
        Wed, 16 May 2018 01:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:620d:: with SMTP id
 g13-v6mr1277923otj.3.1526458473392;
 Wed, 16 May 2018 01:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!paganini.bofh.team!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!v8-v6no817778itc.0!news-out.google.com!b185-v6ni5705itb.0!nntp.google.com!v8-v6no817777itc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 01:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <pdfkk1$pfj$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=85.240.210.249;
 posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.240.210.249
References: <edf7b96a-f340-408c-994f-d5aa73b9f2db@googlegroups.com>
 <p8pe94$3pv$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> <p8rhjh$e44$1@dont-email.me>
 <42387d28-c983-4e58-9522-815ccd1ad0fb@googlegroups.com>
 <p8unbg$soe$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <b0a9cf48-6a6f-4f10-93a7-fd77c427728c@googlegroups.com>
 <6c1e643d-b826-4b8b-b61c-13c56428ed23@googlegroups.com>
 <pdfkk1$pfj$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d294e4a5-864c-4ab0-bf60-6c9a94ace651@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: little precision about anonymous access types
From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 08:14:33 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52366
Date: 2018-05-16T01:14:33-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

So if it was you, you would have treated subprograms with access types parameters as primitives, as long as they are declared in the same immediate scope ? It sounds simple, why hasn't it be do that way ?