From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bf1c1ed22d81eb7e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-04 15:14:28 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: matthewmajka@mac.com (Matt Majka)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Latest GNAT configuration
Date: 4 Sep 2002 15:14:28 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <d243f788.0209041414.76fe1d79@posting.google.com>
References: <d243f788.0208270835.4245b314@posting.google.com>
 <87lm6sjhga.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
 <d243f788.0209031017.651e0da1@posting.google.com>
 <87znuzorto.fsf@inf.enst.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.252.144.19
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1031177668 4784 127.0.0.1 (4 Sep 2002 22:14:28
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Sep 2002 22:14:28 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28745
Date: 2002-09-04T22:14:28+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net> wrote in message news:<87znuzorto.fsf@inf.enst.fr>...
> >>>>> "Matt" == Matt Majka <matthewmajka@mac.com> writes:
> 
> Matt> If I use GNAT 3.14p, which is based on GCC-2.8.1, will there be
> Matt> any incompatibilities between my Ada object code and C or C++
> Matt> object code generated by the GCC-3 compilers?
>  
> Which C++ compiler are you talking about? The C++ ABI of GCC 3.1 and
> GCC 3.2 are incompatible with each others...
> 
>   Sam

All C and C++ code will be using GCC 3.1.1.  I hope to use the Ada
compiler in GCC 3.1.1 as well, but there appear to be GDB deficiencies
at this time.  I am wondering if there are any known problems with
using GCC 2.8.1 for Ada and GCC 3.1.1 for all other code (C and C++)
in the same binary.