From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.36.43.82 with SMTP id h79mr2467080ita.30.1506443113665; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:25:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.36.129 with SMTP id z1mr150084ota.3.1506443113635; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:25:13 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!o200no461571itg.0!news-out.google.com!p6ni672itp.0!nntp.google.com!o200no461570itg.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:25:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4e590963-d6dd-4d83-a0e7-5b4821740e50@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2003:c7:83cd:c37e:e5a1:9d2e:5aad:a75; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83cd:c37e:e5a1:9d2e:5aad:a75 References: <3ca74d75-f942-4e06-a389-cddb77ec244f@googlegroups.com> <4e590963-d6dd-4d83-a0e7-5b4821740e50@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: My first test of github: cpros - lightweight Ada command processor From: AdaMagica Injection-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:25:13 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Body-CRC: 2584249003 X-Received-Bytes: 1924 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48232 Date: 2017-09-26T09:25:13-07:00 List-Id: Am Montag, 25. September 2017 20:34:51 UTC+2 schrieb reinert: > By the way: I made some cosmetic modifications wrt readability (to please the audience). That's the wrong attitude - we do not want to be pleased... All we strive for is good software engineering practices with well documented code and telling identifiers. Do you really think Split_String (former Rsplit) has considerably improved?