From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab1d177a5a26577d X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.theremailer.net!frell.theremailer.net!anonymous From: Fritz Wuehler Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at . Identifying the real sender is technically impossible. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What's wrong with C++? References: <4d5c105a$0$32660$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> Message-ID: Precedence: anon Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:03:01 +0100 Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse@frell.theremailer.net Organization: Frell Anonymous Remailer Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18278 Date: 2011-02-16T21:03:01+01:00 List-Id: > On 2/16/2011 12:37 PM, KK6GM wrote: > > This is a serious question, seeking objective information. C++ and C are both butt-ugly and C++'s operator overloading is stupid. How's that for some objective info ;) > A third is that it has no standard support for concurrent programming, > so such work must be done in an implementation-defined and non-portable > manner. The world is full of race conditions and buffer overflows because of those two languages.