From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.107.163.79 with SMTP id m76mr539521ioe.7.1506989104788; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 17:05:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.58.33 with SMTP id j30mr206023otc.14.1506989104704; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 17:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!v62no3050407itd.0!news-out.google.com!194ni4639itf.0!nntp.google.com!v62no3049928itd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:05:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=178.215.113.26; posting-account=0EXciQoAAABnszktho592qzTsx_OoajA NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.215.113.26 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Why does Ada compile slower than Python? From: Leff Ivanov Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:05:04 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Received-Body-CRC: 4128326536 X-Received-Bytes: 1539 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48298 Date: 2017-10-02T17:05:04-07:00 List-Id: Because it compiles code ahead of time and produce native executable, Pytho= n is interpreted language it compiles to bytecode that then executes using = virtual machine. Generally speaking ahead of time compiled code has a much = better performance than interpreted and even just in time compiled code.