From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,gid115aec,gidf43e6,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newshosting.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!news-peer0-test!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Dowie Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng Subject: Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 19:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Organization: BT Openworld Message-ID: References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <1110032222.447846.167060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org> <3SjWd.103128$Vf.3969241@news000.worldonline.dk> <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <87is4598pm.fsf@insalien.org> <1110054476.533590@athnrd02> <1110059861.560004@athnrd02> <422b6d49.1141887367@news.xs4all.nl> <1110266099.441421.179290@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: host81-154-188-69.range81-154.btcentralplus.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sparta.btinternet.com 1110311533 7427 81.154.188.69 (8 Mar 2005 19:52:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 19:52:13 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1110266099.441421.179290@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8878 comp.lang.c++:44649 comp.realtime:1077 comp.software-eng:4631 Date: 2005-03-08T19:52:13+00:00 List-Id: Jerry Coffin wrote: >>In fact, >>any software system over a half-million lines of >>source code should be coded in >>Ada. > > Here, however, you lose your grip on reality. This is NOT "in fact" -- > it's purely an OPINION! It's certainly possible to find projects that > would involve more than a half-million lines of code for which Ada > would be _extremely_ poorly suited, at best. It's an opinion /nearly/ shared with P. J. Plauger of the ANSI-C committee (and Dinkumware) - only I believe he quoted 100 thousand lines as the point at which you should be using Ada. :-) Cheers -- Martin