From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8e7ac81a215f128c X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!k3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Using Red-Black Trees Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:20:06 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <2419e829-6f45-4075-9005-b9876beb8aaa@r6g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.227.20.141 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1289722806 2445 127.0.0.1 (14 Nov 2010 08:20:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 08:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.227.20.141; posting-account=YboemQoAAADByXNKUQ0Fw0OSJ9Iwf36T User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.12,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15485 Date: 2010-11-14T00:20:06-08:00 List-Id: > Are you sure you need a tree? Skip lists serve the same function, are jus= t as > fast as balanced trees for searching, and faster than the typical tree > implementations for insert and delete. I am not as familiar with skip lists as with trees. Although I would expect both of them to work as they seem to have similar properties and performance. When the rest of my implementation is finished I hope to make a little comparison of which one that performs best for my application. I will definitly have a look at PragmARC. Thanks! /Bj=F6rn