From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1064b1ab66c60577 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-13 04:36:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!server3.netnews.ja.net!south.jnrs.ja.net!not-for-mail From: Dr Steve Sangwine Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: fast FFT code Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:36:05 +0000 Organization: Janet Usenet Reading Service. Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: hyper4.essex.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: south.jnrs.ja.net 1076675767 29634 155.245.41.213 (13 Feb 2004 12:36:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@south.jnrs.ja.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:36:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5523 Date: 2004-02-13T12:36:05+00:00 List-Id: On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:18:05 GMT, tmoran@acm.org wrote: >Can someone point me to an Ada fast FFT code somewhere? In particular for >2D real correlations. I have the "fft_pack" (Glassman's algorithm) but >it's quite general and can presumably be improved on. djbfft 0.76 claims >to be the fastest around, but it's set up for Unix systems and I find it >unreadable, and thus untranslatable, C. Does the FFT have to be written in Ada? How about fast C code and an Ada binding? If this would do, look at FFTW (www.fftw.org) and my FFTW_Ada binding (http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~sjs/fftw_ada/fftwa.html) (not yet modified for the most recent release of FFTW, but it works with the previous one). Steve Sangwine