From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d2f0af5e440b367f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-26 05:52:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Joseph Dalton Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: proposal for new assignment operators Date: 26 Jun 2003 08:52:27 -0400 Organization: Cisco Systems Inc. Message-ID: Sender: jmdalton@jmdalton-u10.cisco.com References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cache-Post-Path: sj-nntpcache-3!unknown@jmdalton-u10.cisco.com X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b2 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39772 Date: 2003-06-26T08:52:27-04:00 List-Id: 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ) writes: ... > It's not really an incompatibility; its just that "=" doesn't happen > to be one of the operators that should have an in-place counterpart. > It wouldn't be useful anyway. After all, none of the languages with > "+=" have "===", do they? Verilog, a hardware description language (modelled on C), has it. -- Joe Dalton