From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a8985ede8fe3d111
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-02 10:13:17 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!cpp
From: cpp@netcom.com (Robin Rowe)
Subject: Re: Is Ada the future? [was: Is C++ the future?]
Message-ID: <cppCx20IA.Anx@netcom.com>
Cc: cpp@netcom.com
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <milodCwwqMy.CK@netcom.com> <36h4pc$9dd@starbase.neosoft.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 1994 16:30:10 GMT
Date: 1994-10-02T16:30:10+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

<< In the meantime, I have a responsibility to write reliable software.  
Ada 9X does that for me in ways that C++ folks are now only dreaming 
about. >>

What Ada 9X dreams am I supposed to be having? How about a 
list of ways that Ada 9X can make more reliable software 
than C++?

Thanks.

Robin
                  
 


-- 
-----
Robin Rowe                 cpp@netcom.com  408-375-9449  Monterey, CA 
Rowe Technology            C++ training, consulting, and users groups.