From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,bf02c238a92156a3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.uni-hamburg.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Windows Ada database support. Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <5e3e03a7.0411240431.7e037a4e@posting.google.com> <2004112420030750073%david@bottoncom> <17w0jtt2xq2ya.1nj2623n37457.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1101726565 2705 134.91.1.34 (29 Nov 2004 11:09:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:09:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6629 Date: 2004-11-29T11:09:25+00:00 List-Id: Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: : : There should be a transaction object, kind of "external" : protected object. Interesting idea. :> At what time should Oracle CURSORs be given up? : : What about n-th level of CPU cache? Do you really care when you write an : Ada application? Is it unusual to think about hardware, timing, resources, ... when you write an Ada application? The moment my DB-software is to be portable, I might not want to have to think about DB specific things. In the case of Oracle cursors it turns out that you might have to manually free resources. Certainly this has effects on the performance characteristics, design etc. And my choice cannot be decided by the vendor. : It is all compiler vendor business. As an application : developer, I want to hear nothing about cursors. Neither would I but I have to. :> How much precision can you portably specify for floating point :> values in your DB independent package? : : The required precision should specify the application. Yes but this also influences what will be in this version of that DB.