From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,1ea59bb198e88f9f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsread.com!newsprint.newsread.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-lei1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.uni-hamburg.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT Ada.Streams Bug? Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1101462579 13559 134.91.1.34 (26 Nov 2004 09:49:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:49:39 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6498 Date: 2004-11-26T09:49:39+00:00 List-Id: Warren W. Gay VE3WWG wrote: : The point about efficiency is also a good one to raise. For : example, if you String'Read(Stream,Var), GNAT calls the : 'Read routine for each and every Character of the string. : One pines for something more efficient than this, and I : hope for the day when this improves in GNAT. (hint) While not a stream of elements, perhaps Fast_Read in the XML/Ada sources is of interest? -- Georg