From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HEADER_SPAM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fc772,745ecf6266b2fdbf X-Google-Attributes: gidfc772,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,745ecf6266b2fdbf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 100850,745ecf6266b2fdbf X-Google-Attributes: gid100850,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,745ecf6266b2fdbf X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,745ecf6266b2fdbf X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-31 20:09:59 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!gemini.plethora.net.POSTED!not-for-mail X-Old-trace: phys-news1.kolumbus.fi 1043982360 2424 212.54.29.20 (31 Jan 2003 03:06:00 GMT) Subject: Re: [ANN] an EBNF parser and coding pattern tool (LGPL) References: From: "White Wolf" X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Organization: Elisa Internet customer X-Msmail-priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 Return-Path: X-Old-complaints-to: abuse@kolumbus.fi X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Newsgroups: comp.lang.c.moderated,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c++.moderated Message-ID: Originator: clcm@plethora.net (Comp Lang C'Moderated) Date: 01 Feb 2003 04:09:52 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: d0abecb9.news.plethora.net X-Trace: 1044072592 gemini.plethora.net 79561 clcm@205.166.146.1 X-Complaints-To: abuse@plethora.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.c.moderated:7335 comp.lang.ada:33666 comp.lang.c:170620 comp.lang.c++:200321 comp.lang.c++.moderated:59776 Date: 2003-02-01T04:09:52+00:00 List-Id: "apm" wrote: [SNIP] > Does this mean it can be used to implement a program that can add and > remove Hungarian warts? This would enable programmers that don't speak > Hungarian to observe corporate standards but still work with > maintainable code. I would appreciate if people could stop here: 1.) connecting the Hungarian notation to Hungarians 2.) call Hungarians warts I _am_ a Hungarian. And I really do not like that tone. Even if it is a joke, it is a bad joke. Two facts: 1.) There are over 15 million other Hungarians than Simonyi 2.) The Hungarian notation has _nothing_ to do with the Hungarian language. In fact, one of the quite frequent prefixes (szar) means sh*t in Hungarian. BTW I am yet to see any Hungarian who likes Hungarian notation. So please keep it in mind, that I will fight 'till death against making the Hungarians targets for lame jokes in the C++ community. And you may wanna notice, that the very computer you use to type in your not-funny lines - among other Hungarians about me - is a Neumann computer. He was a Hungarian, too. WW aka Attila Ps: Now that was one (the post I have answered to), which moderation should have stopped. -- comp.lang.c.moderated - moderation address: clcm@plethora.net